Use of pictures in a snark blog is a tricky thing. Finding pictures of ugly, loathsome and downright horrible crocheted articles is easy, finding those that are not protected in the Sanctuary of Craft- Etsy requires careful, methodical, prowling.
Once the in-season, correct size, non-pregnant Fug is bagged, Fair Use and Comment – that taking/utilising a picture in order to make remarks, wax lyrical and/or snark without claiming, purporting or representing it as “mine own” – is according to the laws of several countries (at least) allowable.
Whilst trawling for fug (Here Fuggie, Fuggie, Fuggie… Eat the nice merino…. Goooood Fuggie….. Gotcha ya little Bastard!) I have preferred and legal hunting spots. But it also means I have seen much in the way of crocheted articles, Fug or otherwise. I also, courtesy of some OCD-ish streak honed by years in jobs where remembering minutae is rewarded, have a good, acknowleged as some as ‘phenomenal’, memory.
Thus, while lurking in the long grass of one manufacturing marketplace, I noted a merchant, touting his ability to mass produce wares, specifically crocheted, specifically… this.
Not a brilliant picture, I’ll admit.
A relatively inoffensive yellowy Baby Afghan.
Which I instantly recognised because a) I’m a pattern hoarder and b) I’ve made this pattern three times myself.
It is, for those of you who don’t recognise it,
one of Terry Kimbrough’s designs.
This one, shown in pink.
Which makes me curious.
Most of us who write patterns (for free usage on our blogs, Crochet Pattern Central or Ravelry) put a caveat regarding what use items made from our patterns may be put to.
And commercial quantities is usually cited as a no-no.
Which leaves me wondering whether this is actually a licensed and legitimate use of a pattern, or if a Shonk has crept into our field of view?